Chris Pickett: Won summary judgment after the court declared that our client’s UM coverage was excess and could not be stacked with the primary UM coverage afforded on a State Farm policy to compensate plaintiff’s estate in fatal automobile accident.

Peter Syregelas: Represented an insurer in a coverage dispute under CGL and business interruption parts to a package policy where a major supplier of animal feed allegedly neglected to add vitamin d supplement to animal feed causing rickets and death in $12 million worth of livestock.

Peter Syregelas: Represented a legal malpractice insurer through trial in rescission of professional liability policy issued to a prominent law firm to obtain rescission based on nondisclosure of a $30 million suit which was threatened against insured but not disclosed on application.

Peter Syregelas: Represented an insurer in a coverage dispute with respect to an agribusiness package policy issued to an animal confined feeding operation (CAFO) when lawsuit was filed against the CAFO operator for alleged pollution discharged into public water supply.

Chris Pickett: The trial court entered summary judgment after finding that the insured’s timely notice of a counterclaim did not excuse the prior 13-month delayed notice of the complaint, thus negating any potential coverage for either claim.