David Osborne Reverses Declaratory Judgment that Insurer Client’s Personal Auto Policy could be “Stacked”
Nov 15, 2009 Appeals
David Osborne: 392 Ill.App.3d 159, 910 N.E.2d 763 (5th Dist. 2009) (reversing declaratory judgment that insurer client’s 100/300 personal auto policy could be “stacked” to provide $3.5 million in “available” combined BI and UM limits for an upcoming wrongful death trial, on the basis that the entire action impermissibly sought […]
David Osborne: 392 Ill.App.3d 159, 910 N.E.2d 763 (5th Dist. 2009) (reversing declaratory judgment that insurer client’s 100/300 personal auto policy could be “stacked” to provide $3.5 million in “available” combined BI and UM limits for an upcoming wrongful death trial, on the basis that the entire action impermissibly sought an advisory opinion under Stokes v. Pekin Ins. Co., supra)