David Osborne Prevails in Arguing that Heatstroke Death did not “Arise out of the Use of an Auto”

Jan 15, 2003 Appeals
David Osborne: 343 Ill.App.3d 309, 795 N.E.2d 1034 (1st Dist. 2003) (prevailed in arguing that heat stroke death of infant abandoned in day-care van did not “arise out of the use of an auto” for purposes of opposing insurer’s auto exclusion, in contrast to other jurisdictions which have decided the […]

David Osborne: 343 Ill.App.3d 309, 795 N.E.2d 1034 (1st Dist. 2003) (prevailed in arguing that heat stroke death of infant abandoned in day-care van did not “arise out of the use of an auto” for purposes of opposing insurer’s auto exclusion, in contrast to other jurisdictions which have decided the precise question to the contrary)