David Osborne Affirms Summary Judgment in Favor of Excess Insurer Client
May 15, 1999 Appeals
David Osborne: 305 Ill.App.3d 1112, 756 N.E.2d 489 (Table) (1st Dist. 1999) (affirming summary judgment in favor of excess insurer client, holding that blanket additional insured endorsement did not apply where underlying contract did not specify provision of excess coverage to additional insured, and did not “drop down” to fill […]
David Osborne: 305 Ill.App.3d 1112, 756 N.E.2d 489 (Table) (1st Dist. 1999) (affirming summary judgment in favor of excess insurer client, holding that blanket additional insured endorsement did not apply where underlying contract did not specify provision of excess coverage to additional insured, and did not “drop down” to fill gap left by named insured’s failure to procure primary additional insured coverage)